Stryker Lawsuit Assistance

Stryker Lawsuit Help 1-800-499-6652

stryker hip recallThe medical equipment manufacturer Stryker Orthopedics has recalled its two hip implants voluntarily.

The models that were recalled were Stryker Rejuvenate and Stryker ABG II as these had the same type of modular neck hip stem.

There are other manufacturers such as Depuy and Zimmer that have also been recalled.

The Michigan based Stryker has made over $8 billion, of which 13% was contributed by the hip implants before the Stryker Hip Recall was issued.  To read more about Strkyer lawsuit litigation please click here.

What Went Wrong with Stryker Hip Implants?

Stryker warned doctors about the potential risks associated with use of their hip implants two months before the official Stryker Hip Recall. This was in an attempt to downplay the initial fear factor that would arise when the recall was made.

The problem associated with these hip implants is that the stem runs deeper into the femur bone of the leg and has the ability to corrode. The Stryker models have displayed a high failure rate within a short period of time and there are speculations that there are very serious issues associated with the hip implants that were recalled.

This recall of the hip implants by Stryker has triggered fears from the patients who are recipients of Rejuvenate and ABG II devices and those that were negatively affected by the implant have filed Stryker lawsuits to potentially receive compensation for their suffering.


Reasons Behind the Stryker Hip Recall:

Stryker hip recall metal on metalStryker discovered that there were numerous problems associated with its two implants even years before they took the initiative to announce the Stryker Hip Recall of the highly dangerous hip stems.

Even though the design was very different from the traditional hip implants, the company performed only a few laboratory tests before marketing it to the public.

While the traditional hip implants had two parts such as femoral stem with a ball and cup, the Rejuvenate and ABG II implants had 4 parts such as femoral stem, tabular cup, metal neck and a ball.

Problematic Design of Implants:

The concept behind such a design was to allow the surgeon to choose the required length and angle for the individual as the implants had 4 parts. The problem with the new design was that it was metal on metal while the traditional devices were made of fiber and plastic.

Therefore, whenever the metal brushes with its metal joint, it results in fretting and corrosion. As the friction increases between the joints, the metal on metal hip implants release great levels of chromium and cobalt ions into the bloodstream, which can lead to metal poisoning, called Metallosis.

Before the Stryker Hip Recall, were you or a family member implanted with the Rejuvenate or ABG II hip device? If the answer is yes, and you have experienced one or more of the following side effects, you may have an excellent case against Stryker.

  •  Fretting
  •  Corrosion
  •  Hip dislocation
  •  Metal poisoning
  •  Intense pain in the hip joints
  •  Crackling
  •  Popping in the metal joints

You may be eligible to receive remuneration for all the pain and suffering you have undergone, or for the invasive hip revision surgeries that would have never needed to occur had the device not been faulty.

Tagged with:

Filed under: Stryker Hip RecallStyker Lawsuit

Stryker Lawsuit Facts Everyone Should Know

Stryker Lawsuit: Important Facts

Stryker lawsuitStryker lawsuit started following a few health concerns reported by some people. Consumers with Stryker metal-on-metal hip replacement implants started experiencing physical discomfort like pain, swelling or difficulty in walking. Although Stryker Corporation recalled two of its hip replacement devices thinking about the worst, it was already too late as many consumers already opted for their products by that time. The Food and Drug Administration department doesn’t support the metal-on-metal hip replacement system anymore. Consumers, who had this implantation in the past, are now suffering because of some product shortcomings. As a result, they’re now suing the corporation and demanding monetary compensation.

Stryker Lawsuit: Why a Metal-on-metal Hip Implant Comes With Dangerous Consequences?

Metal-on-metal hip implants are metal made devices. Its ball, stem and shell – all are metallic. The implants were designed to increase the life span of the device as metals have less wear and tear than implants made of other materials. They were also thought to be safe from other risks like the chances of device fracture or device dislocation. However, a study published in the British Medical Journal revealed some frightening facts about the hip implants. Check out the next section.

Stryker Lawsuit: Truth Behind a Hi Tech MOM Technology

According to the experts, if any two device components grind together, it can generate metal debris in a human body. The metal debris can release harmful toxins in the blood stream and can cause metal poisoning known as metallosis. If you’ve been already witnessing the symptoms, rush to your surgeon to know the next course of action. Although you might need a revision surgery to remove the implants from your body, some dangerous metal particles still can be left behind during the surgery. With the help of Stryker Lawsuit, people of this country are voicing against Stryker’s inability to do justice to its target consumers.

Important Stryker Lawsuit Facts: FDA’s Verdict

The FDA doesn’t favor the metal-on-metal hip implants anymore. The metal implants tend to wear in the long run. Check out FDA’s latest updates on these implants. The FDA is now even more conservative regarding the long term effect of the metal implants.

Why You Should File a Stryker Lawsuit?

  • Your pain has been a result of product design imperfection. You were not aware of the fact that the metal implants produced by the manufacturer could deteriorate and cause health hassles.
  • You need to file a Stryker lawsuit because you’ve been persuaded by the corporation to go for the implant. Manufacturer’s aggressive product promotion strategies were the reason why many people fell for it.
  • The manufacturer failed to identify the shortcomings of its own product.
  • Filing a Stryker lawsuit is recommendable as you deserve to be compensated for your pain and sufferings.
  • You deserve compensation because you’re a victim of negligence. Stryker Corporation was not persistent enough to warn its target consumers against its product’s design or manufacturing faults.

Stryker Lawsuit: Metal-on-metal Hip Implant Side Effects

You know how this product causes metal poisoning in your body. Metal poisoning is caused through the metal debris released into the blood stream when the device components strike against each other. Apart from that, you may also notice conditions like osteolysis, loosening of the implant, fretting, corrosion, fractures or even hip implant dislocation. Unfortunately, the revision surgeries don’t overrule the possibilities of metal poisoning even after the operation. We suggest don’t take this situation lightly. As for metal implant side effects, what else you can expect to happen?

According to the FDA, a few of your important body organs will eventually get exposed to toxic effect. You can suffer impaired kidney functions as a result. Skin rashes can be a common symptom. You may also notice different thyroid abnormalities like sudden change in body weight, fatigue, neck discomfort and chilling sensation. You might even experience vision or hearing conditions. Exposure to toxic effect can lead to Cardio problems like weakening of the heart muscles.

What Kind of Stryker Lawsuit Compensation You can Expect to Receive?

You can file a lawsuit to be fairly reimbursed for your past and future medical expenses, pain and sufferings, any disability caused by the implant, expenses of physical therapy, nursing care service if you’ve hired, surgical fees and medical monitoring expenses. When you hire a lawyer, be sure he/she is aware of all compensation possibilities. A lawyer having relevant experience will know how to file a strong Stryker lawsuit on behalf of a plaintiff.

You can contact our firm if you’ve been looking for a reliable law professional. We’re known for our expertise. Our attorney’s have dealt with many medical device lawsuits, which are referred as product liability lawsuits, in the past. This is why they are fully aware of all kinds of legal proceedings. After you meet them, professionals will determine your eligibility and suggest the best actions to be taken to make the case stronger.

You’ll have the mental peace as our lawyers follow a transparent work process when it comes to letting consumers know about legal terms and conditions. Be sure to talk to our lawyers freely if you’ve any financial obligation. We may sort it out for you and find out a more convenient payment option.

Quick Stryker Lawsuit Facts

Remember, to date, there are basically two types of devices that Stryker recalled – Rejuvenate Modular and Stryker ABG II hip implants. It’s not that all Stryker implants are causing nuisance. Check with your surgeon to know what type of device you’ve been implanted before you file a Stryker lawsuit. Ask your surgeon if you need a revision surgery. Even if you’ve not noticed any side effect till now, it might create symptoms in the long run. So, consult your health supervisor to know if the implants can cause discomfort in the future.

Consumers from different parts of the country have already been witnessing its dangerous repercussions and filing Stryker lawsuits. Contact an expert to know if you’re eligible for a legal claim. If you’ve evidence that shows the implant has caused your physical discomfort, you’ll be eligible for the lawsuit. Although we don’t assure hundred percent success, you’ll get a good support, guide and honest response from us throughout the Stryker lawsuit proceedings.


Tagged with:

Filed under: Styker Lawsuit

Stryker Knee Replacement Recall

Stryker Knee Replacement Recall


Stryker Knee Replacement RecallGetting knee replacement surgery done through Stryker breakthrough product might prove to be lethal for some. After serious complications have been developed in some patients, the firm has decided to recall its products back immediately. Though the FDA lauds the proactive effort from Stryker in protecting the lives of people without thinking about profits, the same laments the recklessness of the firm in offering enough protection for the people when needed the most. Considering the fact that a number of surgeons across the nation are seriously contemplating and performing the operations, it might be just that the matter could be out of hands already.

Some Factors That May Cause Stryker Knee Replacement Recall

Stryker is a famous company that produces a lot of knee replacement devices. There are many people who use the devices from this company. It is very popular for its ShapeMatch Cutting Guide that can be used to help all patients with knee problems. This product is commonly used by many doctors for treating all patients with knee problems. However, there are some issues that may occur with this device. In 2013, FDA notified all healthcare professionals to recall this device because of its defects. There are some reasons behind the Stryker knee replacement recall. You have to read these reasons, so you can know why you have to avoid using this device.


Some Reasons Behind the Stryker Knee Replacement Recall


1. This product doesn’t have FDA approval


This is the first reason why this device is recalled from the market. This product doesn’t have FDA approval for being used in many hospitals and other clinics. Because of that reason, the FDA is not able to check and control the safety of this product. As all we know, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for all medical devices or products that are distributed to public. It is important for all medical device manufacturers to have FDA approval before they can sell their medical devices or products to other health practitioners.


2. Not accurate result


The FDA believes that this device can give wrong result when it is used by most doctors or surgeons. There is a software defect that can result in wide cutting range during the procedure. This is another reason behind the Stryker knee replacement recall. This inaccurate design can lead to wrong displayed parameters, including angle of cut, depth of resection, and some other parameters. It is very important to have the right parameter during the knee surgical procedure. Therefore, this product is not recommended for all surgeons or medical care experts.


3. Can lead to some health problems


This is another reason why there was Stryker knee replacement recall. This product can result in serious health consequences, such as fracture, joint instability, revision surgery, chronic pain, mobility limitation, and some other health problems. The FDA received about 44 reports of incidents related with the use of Stryker ShapeMatch Cutting Guide. There are many other problems that may be caused by this device. It has some defects that can be dangerous for human being. Because of these disadvantages, this product is prohibited for being used by any medical practitioners.


They are some good reasons why FDA had the Stryker knee replacement recall for this product. In 2013, a product notification was released to all agencies, branches, surgeons, or risk managers at certain hospitals. This product has not been available since 2013. All medical care experts are encouraged to report any adverse events or other side effects that may be caused by these products. It is important for all surgeons to find another alternative that can be used to guide them in their surgery. There are some other products that can be used to guide all surgeons in performing their surgery comp

Stryker Knee Replacement Recall After Successful Marketing Of The Product

After being touted as the best thing to happen for knee replacement patients, the use of Stryker products has proved to be a bane for them in several ways. Firstly, it has been observed that numerous problems have been developed in those people gradually who have undergone the surgery already. Secondly, the class I status awarded to the product might be just that many people might lose their life as well. Understanding the intensity of the problem in an effective manner, the firm has issued serious guidelines to all the surgeons and hospitals to not to use the product anymore in the best interests of the lives of patients concerned.

Impact Of Stryker Knee Replacement Recall Upon Knee Replacement Surgeons

Several advancements have been made by the surgeons performing knee replacements by taking advantage of the available technology. The process involves cutting of the bone to the extent where the product fits perfectly. Adverse lapse of the technological features has resulted in the consideration of calling back the product without any information divulged any further. Checking out various features in this regard without checking actual facts might be a bold step. However, there is enough evidence with the FDA already that why any serious action could not be taken.

Major Developments Before the Stryker Knee Replacement Recall Took Place

At a time when the knee replacement surgeries involving Stryker products have been seen as the best options for people even with hopeless situations, the Stryker Knee Replacement Recall is something that is unexpected for sure. Getting the best treatment on time is what looks forward to, but no one would ever like to risk their lives for sure. Perhaps, this is exactly what happened with Stryker due to which expecting normal situation back in the concerned people has become a distant reality.

Possible Issues With Stryker Knee Replacement Recall In The Future

Firstly, those people who have undergone the surgeries might be at serious risk of losing their life. Secondly, others who went through the ordeal could take an effective action against the firm by filing a lawsuit. Additionally, there will be scores of people from different medical backgrounds along with experienced surgeons and medical representatives who will be pressing in for a better explanation about the future. Dealing with all such sensitively complex situations without hurting anyone is not an easy thing to contain for sure.

Crucial Information About Stryker Knee Replacement Recall Products

Knee replacement surgeries for athletes and others have proved to be a boon in recent times due to the advanced in modern medical technologies. However, there are certain instances such as the Stryker Knee Replacement Recall that make things hugely complicated to understand for sure. Getting along with the situation without going through any major health issues is something that everyone looks forward to during such hopeless situations. It has been observed that some patients have developed serious complications even after the surgery has went all the way fine. The whole blame has to be put on the cutting guides available from shapematch to assist surgeons further.

All You Need To Know In Detail About Stryker Knee Replacement Recall

At a time when the knee replacement surgery is seen as the only hope for people with adverse knee problems, it cannot be understood how the knee recalls from Stryker could ever take place. It all began with serious side effects cropping up in those who have already undergone the surgery. Instead of betting the personal health condition with perfect functioning of the knee, the entire matter got worsened much to everyone’s surprise. It is only then that Stryker started taking a serious note of the concluding happenings that it started instructing surgeons not to perform the surgeries anymore.

Portage Inspection Is the Key For Stryker Knee Replacement Recall

There is solid proof available with the FDA that the firm immediately started issuing warnings to the concerned hospitals and surgeons who might get along with the surgeries. As far as Stryker is concerned, there is much to show in the form of Portage inspection that holds the crucial details about how the surgery could be malicious for people. Several issues have been taken into consideration in the Stryker Knee Replacement Recall in order to ensure that everything goes fine so that the perfect health standards could be maintained.

Class I Status Awarded To Stryker Knee Replacement Recall By FDA

Though it is considered as a healthy sign that Stryker has recalled its products and devices on time, things are not cozy in retrospect. Dealing with such serious is not a simple thing to manage as it is related to the lives of several people. The fact that these serious deformities have been categorized under Class I means that it could amount to death as well in some people. Being proactive by avoiding the products completely will prove to be most effective on an overall.

Stryker Knee Replacement Recall Is The Right Move At A Right Time

Just when more and more surgeons have started prescribing the product for their patients, the Stryker Knee Replacement Recall aspect has taken everyone aback. Moreover, there are health specialists who are puzzled over all the recent developments. One wonders that how such a product that passed all the stringent medical tests from a corporate perspective could every fail. Considering the fact that it has already been marketed extensively across the nation, it will be a huge setback medically and financially for people associated with the product in several ways. However, protecting the health of people is something that is more important than anything else.




Tagged with:

Filed under: Strkyer Knee Replacement RecallStryker Knee Replacement LawsuitStyker Lawsuit

Stryker Hip Recall Lawsuit Update

An Update on the Stryker Hip Recall Lawsuit Litigation

Stryker Hip Recall Lawsuit Update

This hip recall was classified as a Class II recall by US FDA. This means that the health consequences caused by these devices are temporary or medically reversible and the probability of these causing serious adverse health concerns is remote. After the Stryker Hip Recall, the company was open to reimburse the costs related to this recall that were incurred by the recipients.

Since the hip recall, there have been a number of lawsuits filed across the country over the hip replacement devices and the number has been increasing significantly. The recipients who have filed these lawsuits are demanding compensation for suffering due to pain, lost wages, past, present and future unforeseen medical expenses and other claims. The Stryker Multicounty Litigation (MCL) has been proceeding in New Jersey since January 2013.

As of September, there were 382 plaintiffs in the MCL court in the Stryker hip recall lawsuit cases. It is important to note that in January 2013, there were only 10 participating plaintiffs. The figure increased to 306 in August 2013 and to 382 by September.

In June 2013, the U.S Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, also called as JPML, unified all Stryker hip recall lawsuits at the federal level to form a MDL or multidistrict litigation in Minnesota. The number of plaintiffs in the MDL is also increasing rapidly.

As of August 2013, there were 198 cases whereas now in October 2013, there are 290 plaintiffs, showing that there has been a 46.5 percent increase. These consolidations to form the MCL and MDL have happened in both New Jersey and Minnesota respectively to increase the efficiency of the pretrial proceedings in both the courts.

Stryker Orthopaedics’ Reponse to the Stryker Hip Recall Lawsuits

Due to the staggering increase in lawsuits being filed against it, the Stryker Corp. has partnered with a third party claims administrator to work directly with the recipients. The third party administrator is expected to manage the claims related to the hip recall.

As with all other claims procedures, there are a number of finer points that will require a thorough study under the microscope. So the recipients should first contact our Stryker Hip Recall Lawsuit attorneys before they get in touch with the representatives of the Stryker hip recall claims program.

It has become very evident that the number of people who have been affected by these hip devices is large. The number of lawsuits being filed nationwide is a reminder that the impact of the Stryker hip recall has spread across the country and not specific to a single region or state. Click Here if you would like to read more about Stryker Hip Implants.

If you have been fitted with one of these defective hip devices and suffered complications, you may be eligible for compensation.


Tagged with:

Filed under: Styker Lawsuit

Stryker Rejuvenate Recall

Stryker Rejuvenate Recall Litigation in State, Federal Courts

stryker rejuvenate recallStryker Orthopaedics has ceased to recruit subjects for its longitudinal study on one of its two recently recalled hip implant models, but it has continued to try to resolve lawsuits filed by the ailing patients of both hip replacement stems.  Meanwhile, a major orthopedic medical journal has published a study that reaffirmed the corrosive potential of such devices.

The New Jersey-based medical technology corporation June 28, 2012, voluntarily recalled its Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck hip stems and announced July 6, 2012, that it had “terminate[d] global distribution of these products” based on data derived from “continued post-market surveillance.

These were not all-metal devices.  Nevertheless, the necks, for instance, were made of a “cobalt chrome alloy,” according to Stryker’s answer to lawsuits filed in state court in New Jersey.  The metal parts posed certain adverse-reaction risks. Ultimately, as New Jersey’s multi-county litigation center quoted the manufacturer, “These risks include the potential for fretting and/or corrosion at or about the modular-neck junction, which may result in adverse local tissue reactions manifesting with pain and/or swelling. … Possible adverse outcomes allegedly include metallosis, necrosis and osteolysis.”

Study Published on Complications of Affected Stryker Hip Recipients

The May 2013 edition of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery published research in accordance with the reported damage that plaintiffs in Stryker class action lawsuits have suffered.

“Corrosion at the modular neck-body junction in dual-tapered stems with a modular cobalt-chromium-alloy femoral neck can lead to release of metal ions and debris resulting in local soft-tissue destruction,” concluded researchers from Northwestern University and Indiana University medical schools and from Rush University Medical Center.  They evaluated the case studies on 12 new hips at multiple medical centers.  “Adverse local tissue reaction should be considered as a potential cause for new-onset pain in patients with these components, and early revision should be considered given the potentially destructive nature of these reactions.

“A workup including serologic studies (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein), serum metal levels, and MARS MRI can be helpful in establishing this diagnosis.”

Some of the adverse-event reports were serious enough that Stryker promulgated in its patient follow-up guidance, “Stryker is suggesting that surgeons consider performing a clinical examination, such as blood work and cross sectional imaging, on all patients who received a Rejuvenate or ABG II modular-neck hip stem regardless of whether a patient is experiencing pain and/or swelling.”

Continuing to observe the performance of the Rejuvenate model, Stryker has been sponsoring a clinical trial since November 2010, for which data was scheduled to be collected through November 2022.  Trial researchers reported April 12 that the study had ceased recruiting subjects.  The Stryker Rejuvenate patients “will be evaluated for freedom of hip revision at 5 years and clinical outcomes for up to 10 years after surgery,” according to a summary of the study made available by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Many patients, especially those who have been injured by the Stryker Rejuvenate Recall, have turned to their surgeons for help, an option Stryker has been recommending.  Some have taken the additional step of exercising their right to seek compensation after experiencing side effects related to the Stryker Rejuvenate Recall.

Stryker Orthopaedics on the Defense

Stryker has been defending itself from hip replacement failure litigation filed at the state and federal levels.  The door is still open for injured patients to follow suit. Stryker has been financially equipping for the formidable challenge following the Stryker Rejuvenate Recall.

Referring to the cost of dealing with product liability lawsuits on one hand and reimbursements for patient testing, treatment and revision surgeries on the other, Stryker estimated that “the probable loss to resolve this matter [would] be in the range of approximately $190 million to $390 million, before third-party insurance recoveries,” according to Stryker’s recently released annual report for 2012.

Claimants’ causes of action include negligence, defects in design and in manufacture, and the failure to warn of increased risks of serious complications.  Some lawsuits have sought compensation for impairment of marital relations that hip replacement injury and surgical revision have exacted.

Multi-county state-court litigation has been centralized in New Jersey, the home state of Stryker Orthopaedics, before Judge Brian R. Martinotti in Bergen County.  The next status conference has been scheduled for June 18.

Meanwhile, federal multidistrict litigation was designated for oral arguments at a May 30 hearing in Louisville, Ky., where two plaintiffs motioned for the consolidation of certain actions to federal district court in Minnesota and to federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Anyone who has suffered tissue damage and related injuries that may be traced to the Stryker Rejuvenate Recall or ABG II may be entitled to compensation for their suffering.

Tagged with:

Filed under: Stryker Rejuvenate Recall

Stryker Class Action Lawsuit

Are You Eligible to Join a Stryker Class Action Lawsuit?

stryker class action lawsuitStryker Orthopedics have been in the news of late having recalled, voluntarily, components of metal hip replacement confirming the claim metal-on-metal type of replacements are innately faulty and dangerous. The ABG II and Rejuvenate modular neck stems have been pulled. Due to their corroding nature, they are attached to hips made artificially. The result is swelling and pain due to inflammation on the tissues surrounding it. The recalling of the Stryker Modular neck stems by doctors is supposed to correct a number of issues in the anatomy of the recipient. They were marketed as ideal for younger patients since the artificial components were meant to offer better motion range and hip implants that last for a long time. The metal on metal hips have caused more harm than good, and the side effects they cause have lead to victims filing a Stryker Class Action Lawsuit.

If you have been implanted with a Stryker hip device of this nature, you may be eligible to join the Stryker class action lawsuit intended to offset medical bills and other losses related to your injury.


Problems with Stryker Metal-on-Metal Devices

You might be wondering what the problem is with these Stryker products. They have metal necks located within metal stems risking metal poisoning and damage of body parts of the recipients. Due to potential friction and metal corrosion taking place between the stem and the neck piece, the device could occasion metallic debris of a microscopic nature causing the most severe inflammatory responses across the entire body. The result is damaged soft tissue and muscles while compromising revision surgery. In fact, it has been found that a minimum of 45 patients with the Stryker implants of ABG II and Rejuvenate modular neck stems have serious tissue swelling and reported pain, thus the Stryker class action lawsuit.

The Stryker hips are at variance with the design of other implants of metal-on-metal, involving a socket and a metal ball.The devices are linked to hip-replacement failure, loosening, metal poisoning, and other complications. The corrosion of the metal implant can lead to excessive cobalt levels in the blood which cause thyroid, nerve and heart problems.

More than one Stryker class action lawsuit has been reported after more evidence on hip implants has shown a lot of side effects as compared to implants made from plastic or ceramic. It is something that led Stryker to recall the implants, meaning litigation will increase from those patients claiming the hip implants have injured them one way or the other.


Tagged with:

Filed under: Styker Lawsuit